Sol041706
Define for positive, real x, not just integers:
Solution from landen
From the Stirling series for the log of the gamma function, equation 8, in this MathWorld (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/StirlingsSeries.html) article. We can obtain:
Since equality holds in our proposition (2) in the limit at x=2, the series (3) cannot directly prove (2). Instead we can start at (2!)2=22, and prove that x!2 has a larger derivative than x^x.
For x>2 Eqn. (4) can be truncated to give Ineq (5) by the properties of alternating decreasing series. Then the main proposition (2) follows by using a calculator on (5) or using a little theory on the simple expressions and comparing their derivatives.